Specific municipal codes that commonly lead to permit rejections
In our last article, we discussed the challenges that builders and developers face while navigating the world of permitting. We explored the monetary impact on builders and developers, as well as some of the upcoming regulatory changes that will impact these construction markets in the near future. Below we’ll dive further into specific codes across the country that cause permit rejections.
Since codes vary from city-to-city and state-to-state, every city's rejection rates also vary. However, there are certain municipal codes in every geography that often lead to a poor permitting outcome. The list below is not exhaustive, but a good starting place to understand if you’re building in a new area or if you’ve had previous rejections in any of these municipalities. Also, see snips of the Code Clarifier in action for a handful of these!
For residential housing in the City of Los Angeles, builders commonly miss the specific seismic retrofit requirements when building a living space above a garage or other open-concept ground floor. The following sections detail out the requirements for analyzing and retrofitting soft-story buildings to resist seismic forces. Missing this can result in permit rejection due to non-compliance with seismic safety standards.
In Boston’s historic districts, developers and building retro-fitters often overlook the requirements for preserving historic building facades or adhering to specific design guidelines that maintain the historical character of the area. Any changes to the exterior of historic buildings must be approved by the local historical commission. Developers who fail to submit appropriate plans that preserve historical elements or who propose non-compliant alterations risk permit rejections and delays.
Development projects within San Diego’s Coastal Zone require a Coastal Development Permit (CDP). Developers often miss the extensive documentation required to demonstrate compliance with coastal protection laws, including public access, environmental preservation, and building height restrictions. Inadequate documentation or failure to secure a CDP can result in permit rejections.
When building in areas designated as high-risk flood zones in Miami, stringent floodplain management and elevation requirements are required. The city requires that residential buildings in these areas be elevated to a certain height above the base flood elevation (BFE). Additionally, requirements for anchoring and materials exist in order to prevent flood damage.
In San Francisco, many developers fail to meet fire safety and egress requirements, particularly in multi-family residential buildings. One common oversight is inadequate egress windows in bedrooms, which must meet specific size and operability criteria to allow occupants to escape in an emergency. Windows that do not meet the minimum size (at least 5.7 square feet, with a minimum opening height of 24 inches and width of 20 inches) or fail to provide clear access to the outdoors can lead to permit rejections.
If you’re a developer, builder, solar/storage installer, electrician, or any other trade that comes in contact with municipal codes, doing your research beforehand will not only save you time in the long-run, but also lower your soft costs.
In the next article in the series, learn how to lower barriers to entry when expanding your geographic footprint. We will discuss ways to speed up the code/requirement research and decrease the cost impacts of growing into a new region that you plan on serving.